Reaching Judge At Nuremberg

Reaching Judge At Nuremberg

Reaching Judge At Nuremberg s t The Untold Story of How the Nazi War Criminals Were Judged years after the event the historic judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal that tried Nazi Germany s major war criminals continues to haunt

  • Title: Reaching Judge At Nuremberg
  • Author: Bradley F. Smith
  • ISBN: 9780465068395
  • Page: 303
  • Format: Hardcover
  • s t The Untold Story of How the Nazi War Criminals Were Judged30 years after the event, the historic judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal that tried Nazi Germany s major war criminals continues to haunt us Was justice done or are the critics right when they point to the continuing persistence of crimes against the peace against humanity in Russia, Vietnam, South Afris t The Untold Story of How the Nazi War Criminals Were Judged30 years after the event, the historic judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal that tried Nazi Germany s major war criminals continues to haunt us Was justice done or are the critics right when they point to the continuing persistence of crimes against the peace against humanity in Russia, Vietnam, South Africa elsewhere as proof that the whole enterprise was doomed from the beginning to be nothing than the judgment of the victors over the vanquished What went on in the minds of the judges as they listened to the sickening evidence, heard the interminable wrangling of the lawyers, looked at the arrogant, humble, defiant penitent defendants before them tried to render a verdict

    • Free Read [Philosophy Book] Ë Reaching Judge At Nuremberg - by Bradley F. Smith ↠
      303 Bradley F. Smith
    • thumbnail Title: Free Read [Philosophy Book] Ë Reaching Judge At Nuremberg - by Bradley F. Smith ↠
      Posted by:Bradley F. Smith
      Published :2019-09-17T07:34:09+00:00

    105 Comment

    One of the last papers I researched in high school was about the first Nuremberg trial held in 1946 by victorious Russian, French, British and American forces to judge those who were deemed major German war criminals. Since then I've read biographies and autobiographies of some of the principals, the memoirs of the US army psychiatrist who analyzed the defendants and hosts of books about the war and its aftermath. Consequently, this reading was far more informed--as well as it should have been, [...]

    I got this book out after watching a BBC documentary on Nuremberg. The documentary only covered 3 of the defendants. Thought filled with a lot of technical language, the author does a pretty good job of explaining why the 8 tribunal judges voted the way they did. He showed no biases and explained the verdicts through a legal POV. I'd recommend this one for those looking into the legal side of the trial. I would caution those with merely mild interest though.

    I came to this and the other book by Smith from the Ward Churchill archive of footnotes. The central issue at Nurmeberg was two fold: How to get get the Brits, French, and Soviets on board for convicting in steading of just executing Nazi leaders; and how to create retroactive laws by which to perform the convictions given that legally, the Nazis seemed to have broken no laws. The fact that the US made all this happened tells something not only about law but about way in which humans create noos [...]

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *